

The Sun is facing questions over its coverage of allegations against the 61-year-old newsreader- with some asking whether the claims should have been reported at all.Īfter Edwards's wife Vicky Flind publicly named him and police said there was no evidence of criminal offences on Wednesday evening, the paper released its own statement, stating it had "no plans to publish further allegations".ĭescribed as a "very carefully crafted legal statement" by former Mirror editor Paul Connew, it said: "The Sun at no point in our original story alleged criminality and also took the decision neither to name Mr Edwards nor the young person involved in the allegations." With Huw Edwards in hospital with "serious mental health issues" and facing no further action by police, the newspaper that broke the story is now under the spotlight. I don't think anyone is suggesting there was no wrongdoing done," Mr Wallis added. The police have since said there was no evidence of a crime being committed. They got nowhere there either," Mr Wallis said.Īfter The Sun's story was released, a lawyer representing the young person involved said the claims made by their parents were "rubbish" and nothing "inappropriate or unlawful" took place. They went to the BBC and begged them to stop this man from giving his money to their son. "They went to the police and got no help there. The Sun first published allegations made by the parents of a young person that a BBC presenter, who was later named as Edwards, had paid their child around £35,000 for sexually explicit photos. "They gave desperate parents an opportunity to stop what they saw as a terrible thing."

They handled it with, as far as I can see, discretion," he said. "They broke a story of massive public interest.

Speaking to Sky News, Neil Wallis defended the tabloid's coverage after many people took aim at its reporting over the Huw Edwards allegations.
ROGER CLARK AGE TV
He has made such amount of wealth from his primary career as TV Actor.The Sun told a story of "massive public interest" and handled it with "discretion, a former deputy editor of the paper has said. Roger Clark net worth or net income is estimated to be between $1 Million – $5 Million dollars. His relationship status is single.įamily Information Parents Name Spouse Name Children Name Number of Children(s) N/A Partner Name Relative(s) Name Height N/A Weight N/A Bust – Waist – Hip N/A Hair Color Eye Color Shoe Sizeīefore he was famous, He was an Irish dancing champion in his childhood. Here is the Body measurement informations. Roger sun sign is Cancer and his birth flower is Larkspur & Water Lily.īirth date 14-Jul Day of Birth Friday Year of Birth 1978 Birth Sign Cancer Birth Sign Duality Passive Birth Sign Modality & Element Cardinal Water Opposite Sign Capricorn Roger Clark birthday is on 14-Jul-78 and he was born on Friday.
ROGER CLARK AGE FULL
Bio / Wiki Full Name Roger Clark Occupation Actor Age 45 Date of Birth JPlace of Birth New Jersey Star Sign Cancer Country United States Gender Male
